ummtaalib Posted June 18, 2014 Report Share Posted June 18, 2014 Mut’ah: The Shia menace; Compared with a blissful marriage Following is an important article written by my dear friend Mawlana Usman Iqbal. He compares marriage with Mut’ath and explains the harms of Mut’ah. We have heard that it’s not only the Shias who are in to Mut’ah, many salfees also practice it on uni campuses. May Allah give hidayat to all Muslims. Marriage- Shiaism vs Islam In Islam marriage is a long-term commitment which requires loyalty from both husband and wife. Islam gives women security and encourages life-long marriage relationships. We learn from various narrations that a successful marriage does not end at death, rather, it will continue in jannah. Hence, there are numerous virtues of reconciling between husband and wife in the case of a marital dispute, for the sake of saving the marriage and avoiding a break up. In the Islamic approach to marriage women receive numerous rights. For example, a woman whose husband passes away will inherit a fixed share of his assets. Also, if she has a child to him then the child’s parentage is established through the mother and father, making this child part of a wider family unit consisting of maternal and paternal relations, and successful family units form successful nations. Shiaism, on the other hand, encourages a temporary marriage contract known as mut’ah, which is void of the benefits marriage is expected to bring about. Mut’ah literally means ‘pleasure’ and ‘gratification’. In Shiaism terms, mut’ah is when a man has the right to sexually gratify himself with a non-mahram woman for a period of time, and a price, mutually agreed upon by the two. Shias have no minimum or maximum time limit for mut’ah. This means that a mut’ah contract may be drawn for a year, month, week, day, hour or even minutes, so long as the time and price is clearly stipulated. The price can be anything as small as a handful of dates or barley. (1) In Shiaism, neither is consent or knowledge of the women’s guardian a requirement for the permissibility of the mut’ah contract, nor do they both need witnesses present. Nobody besides the man and woman need to know of the mut’ah. When the mut’ah contract time expires the woman and man both go their separate ways without the man having to issue a divorce, regardless of whether she may well have conceived an unwanted pregnancy.(2) Shias believe mut’ah can be practiced with all non-mahram women, including adulterous women. Furthermore, Shias are permitted to perform mut’ah with married Sunni Muslim women, for, Shias do not recognize the marriages of Sunni Muslims, as they believe Sunnis are heretics and out of the fold of Islam. Mut’ah can be performed by Shias with Christian, Hindu and Zoroastrian women too, on the condition that they say ‘There is no god but Allah’ regardless of whether or not they genuinely believe. (3) In mut’ah, the man is not obliged to provide provisions and living quarters for the woman. Now you may decide for yourself whether you see a difference between mut’ah and adultery? Doesn’t what happens in mut’ah happen exactly in adultery too? If this is marriage according to Shias then one wonders how they define adultery? A hadith strengthens claims that Shia mut’ah is just another name for adultery. The Messenger SAW has said: “There will be among my ummah people who will strive to permit illegal sexual activity (zinaa), silk, alcohol and musical instruments.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari) It is shocking to learn from authentic Shia sources that this type of mut’ah is one of the fundamentals of Shiaism. Ithna Ashariyyah Shias (Twelver Shias) believe one who does not believe in mut’ah is a disbeliever and the faith of one who does not practice mut’ah is incomplete, and that he will come on the Day of Judgment with his mouth, nose and ears mutilated. (4) Does Shia mut’ah not pave the way for immorality? Can such a practice be part of a religion like Islam which advocates morality, decency and security for women? Are women so cheap for men to be allowed to just abandon them after having used them for sexual gratification? Dr. Donna M. Hughes writes:“According to an official source in Tehran, there has been a 635 percent increase in the number of teenage girls in prostitution, or rather, Mutah. The magnitude of this statistic conveys how rapidly this form of abuse has grown. In Tehran, there are an estimated 84,000 women and girls in prostitution, many of them are on the streets, others are in the 250 brothels that reportedly operate in the city. The trade is also international: thousands of Iranian women and girls have been “contracted in Mutah” to foreigners abroad. The head of Iran’s Interpol bureau believes that the Mutah trade is one of the most profitable activities in Iran today. The Mutah “pimps” take advantage of any opportunity in which women and children are vulnerable. For example, following the recent earthquake in Bam, orphaned girls have been contracted out in Tehran where Iranian and foreign traders meet. Police have uncovered a number of Mutah rings operating from Tehran that have sold girls to France, Britain, and Turkey as well. One network based in Turkey bought smuggled Iranian women and girls, gave them fake passports, and transported them to European and Persian Gulf countries. In one case, a 16-year-old girl was smuggled to Turkey, and then sold in Mutah to a 58-year-old European national for $20,000.(Adapted from an article written by Dr. Donna M. Hughes who is a Professor and holds the Carlson Endowed Chair in Women’s Studies at the University of Rhode Island) Printed and online Shia material in English usually does a good job of taqiyyah (lying) and kitman (hiding the truth) about mut’ah by downplaying it because it gives Shias a bad image in front of English-speaking westerners. However, the Shia websites and printed material in the Arabic and Farsi languages do not have to take the same precautions and can instead be more open and frank about the Shia belief of mut’ah. Why then do Shias make it out as if mut’ah is a part of Islam? With regards to mut’ah, Shias have gone wrong in two major ways: 1. By misinterpreting the word mut’ah mentioned in authentic books of hadith. 2. By refusing to accept that mut’ah was made permissible during travels and only for some time. It was later abrogated (made haram forever). The mut’ah permitted in the early days of Islam was nothing like the mut’ah of Shiaism. The mut’ah of Shiaism is clearly another word for adultery, whereas, the mut’ah which was permissible in the early days of Islam was merely nikah muwaqqat. In other words, it was a nikah in the presence of witnesses and with the consent of the woman’s guardian for a fixed period of time. After the passing of this period the woman would have to observe an iddat (waiting period) lasting one menstrual cycle to remain safe from his semen mixing with another man’s semen inside her reproductive organs. (Adapted from Mawlana Idris Kandehlwi’s Ma’ariful Quran V.2 Pg.51) Even reliable Shia sources (Al-Istibsar V.3 Pg.148) state that the Noble Companions never practiced the mut’ah nikah without witnesses. What was referred to as mut’ah in the early days of Islam was actually a form of nikah. This can be understood from the fact that the Noble Companions would draw the contract using the word ‘nikah’. Another point to note here is that in the early days of Islam such a nikah would render it necessary on the man to provide provisions and living quarters for the woman, unlike Shia mut’ah. Later, the Noble Prophet SAW made this type of nikah haram till the Day of Judement. (5) Such a mut’ah nikah was only permitted for a short period of time. Some narrations state it was permitted for only three days during one of the battles and later made haram forever. (6) No Muslim is allowed to practice mut’ah as its lawfulness has been abrogated just like alcohol, which was allowed until the Muslims migrated to Madina munawwarah. It was declared haram in the year 3AH. Just as one who considers alcohol to be still halal, cannot be a Muslim, similarly, one who considers mut’ah to be halal cannot be a Muslim. It is also important to understand that the mut’ah nikah in early Islam was permitted under exceptional circumstances only. Not everyone was permitted to practice mut’ah, and nor did they. This point is substantiated by the statement of Sayyiduna Ibn Abbas RA: “I have not said mut’ah to be halal any differently to how Allah made the carcass, pig meat and blood halal (to consume when one fears hunger may kill him).” (7) Sayyiduna Ibn Abi ‘Amrah RA states: “It was permitted in the early days of Islam for one who was compelled to it; like eating a carcass, pig meat and drink blood (when compelled by hunger). Subsequently, Allah perfected the deen and forbade it.” (8) Further, temporary marriage was only permitted during travels. It was never permitted at home. (9) Mut’ah has been made haram through several narrations narrated by the great personalities who Shias consider to be their infallible Imams. Of such great personalities are the great Sayyiduna Ali RA Imam Ja’far Sadiq RA whose narrations can be found in prominent Shia books. (10) In short, mut’ah in early Islam was exactly like a normal nikah. Witnesses would be present and an announcement would be made. Provisions and living quarters were provided by the man for his wife. After the expiry of the contract iddat was observed by the woman. The only difference was that they would agree on an expiry date for the nikah contract. Such a mut’ah was made haram by the Messenger SaW. No Muslim has the authority to oppose the teachings of Allah’s Messenger SAW. On the contrary, in shiaism, No witnesses are required, No announcement needs to be made and No iddat is required when doing mut’ah. It is merely a meeting of a man and woman for sexual gratification. Many efforts are being made by Shias and non-Muslim agencies to promote mut’ah and depict it as a forgotten Islamic practice to Muslim students at universities and colleges. After this short read you are humbly requested to educate other Muslim brothers and sisters in this regard in order to protect them from the sin of adultery. May Allah protect the entire Muslim world from all evil plots. 1. Furu’ Al-Kafi V. 5 Pg 455, V. 5 Pg 4572.Tahdheeb al-Ahkam V. 2 Pg 189,V. 3 Pg 148, V. 5 Pg 4583.Tahrir al-wasilah V.2 Pg 292 by Ayatollah Khomeini,Tuhfa ithna ashariyya Pg 779 [urdu]4.Al-Istibsar V.3 Pg 144, Haqq al-Yaqeen Pg 328/ Tafsir Manhaj al-Sadiqin Pg 351 & 256/ Wasa’il al-Shi’ah V.7 Pgs 438 & 441 & 442.5. Sahih Bukhari V.2 Pg.664, Sahih Muslim V.1 Pg.452, Fathul mulhim V.2 Pg.441, Tafseer Al-Qurtubi V.5 Pg.1326. Fathul bari V.19 Pg.208, Fathul mulhim V.3 Pg.447. (Majma al-zawaaid 4/268)8. Sahih Muslim V.2 Pg.4529. Tafseer al-Qurtubi V.5 Pg.13110. Al-Istibsar V.3 Pg.144, Furu’ al-Kafi V.5 Pg.453 Tafseer Raheemi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ummtaalib Posted October 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2015 Muta'h Q: I am living abroad and I want to save myself from zina. Can I marry for a month? My partner is also ready. A: This is not a nikaah, rather it is the muta'h that is practised by the Shias. Muta'h is where a man and woman mutually agree on a stipulated period of nikaah in order to satisfy their sexual desires and thereafter separate. In reality this is not a nikaah, rather it is zina. This type of arrangement is totally haraam in Islam. Hence as long as they remain together, they will both be living in zina. One should understand that in Shari'ah one is commanded to make nikaah in order to reap the desired object and purpose of nikaah. The main purpose and object of nikaah - apart from it serving as a halaal avenue to fulfil one's desires - is that each spouse should be an assistant and support for the other in fulfilling the orders of Allah Ta'ala and in practising Deen. Each spouse should act responsibly and fulfil the obligations and duties of the nikaah that have been assigned to them by Allah Ta'ala. The offspring born from such a wedlock will have to be given the required Islamic upbringing and care that is needed and each spouse should play an important role in imbibing the correct Islamic values and creating the correct mindset within the children. Naturally the object and purpose of nikaah will not be achieved through remaining with someone for a stipulated period just in order to satisfy one's sexual desires and thereafter separate. And Allah Ta'ala (الله تعالى) knows best. ( وبطل نكاح متعة ومؤقت ) وإن جهلت المدة أو طالت في الأصح قال الشامي : قوله ( وبطل نكاح متعة ومؤقت ) قال في الفتح قال شيخ الإسلام في الفرق بينهما أن يذكر الوقت بلفظ النكاح والتزويج وفي المتعة أتمتع أو أستمتع اه يعني ما اشتمل على مادة متعة والذي يظهر مع ذلك عدم اشتراط الشهود في المتعة وتعيين المدة وفي المؤقت الشهود وتعيينها ولا شك أنه لا دليل لهم على تعيين كون المتعة الذي أبيح ثم حرم هو ما اجتمع فيه مادة م ت ع للقطع من الآثار بأنه كان أذن لهم في المتعة وليس معناه أن من باشر هذا يلزمه أن يخاطبها بلفظ أتمتع ونحوه لما عرف أن اللفظ يطلق ويراد معناه فإذا قيل تمتعوا فمعناه أوجدوا معنى هذا اللفظ ومعناه المشهور أن يوجد عقدا على امرأة لا يراد به مقاصد عقد النكاح من القرار للولد وتربيته بل إلى مدة معينة ينتهي العقد بانتهائها أو غير معينة بمعنى بقاء العقد ما دام معها إلى أن ينصرف عنها فلا عقد فيدخل فيه بمادة المتعة والنكاح المؤقت أيضا فيكون من أفراد المتعة وإن عقد بلفظ التزويج وأحضر الشهود اه ملخصا وتبعه في البحر والنهر ثم ذكر في الفتح أدلة تحريم المتعة وأنه كان في حجة الوداع وكان تحريم تأبيد لا خلاف فيه بين الأئمة وعلماء الأمصار إلا طائفة من الشيعة ونسبة الجواز إلى مالك كما وقع في الهداية غلط ثم رجح قول زفر بصحة المؤقت على معنى أنه ينعقد مؤبدا ويلغو التوقيت لأن غاية الأمر أن المؤقت متعة وهو منسوخ لكن المنسوخ معناها الذي كانت الشريعة عليه وهو ما ينتهي العقد فيه بانتهار المدة فإلغاء شرط التوقيت أثر النسخ وأقرب نظير إليه نكاح الشغار وهو أن يجعل بضع كل من المرأتين مهرا للأخرى فإنه صح النهي عنه وقلنا يصح موجبا لمهر المثل لكل منهما فلم يلزمنا النهي بخلاف ما لو عقد بلفظ المتعة وأراد النكاح الصحيح المؤبد فإنه لا ينعقد وإن حضره الشهود لأنه لا يفيد ملك المتعة كلفظ الإحلال فإن من أحل لغيره طعاما لا يملكه فلم يصلح مجازا عن معنى النكاح كما مر اه ملخصا قوله ( وإن جهلت المدة ) كأن يتزوجها إلى أن ينصرف عنها كما تقدم ح (رد المحتار 3/ 51) Answered by: Mufti Zakaria Makada Checked & Approved: Mufti Ebrahim Salejee (Isipingo Beach) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now